re: #40 Destro

Here are a few more questions to add to the many substantive questions in this threat that you have still failed to even attempt to answer:

1. Did the regime in Iraq that was overthrown as a result of the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq kill, maim or commit any other actions that, under the rules of international law, are crimes against humanity?

2. Is it your position that, absent the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, no blood of innocents would have been spilled at the hands of the Saddam regime? If yes, please provide factual support for your argument.

3. Is it your position that Saddam’s victims, past and potential, were not entitled to cosideration or protection by the international community and that he should have smiply been allowed to continue butchering, raping, torturing and otherwise opporessing the population of his country? If yes, please explain why the blood of Saddam’s victims are not the “blood of innocents”.

4. Here’s a more basic one. Please provide support for your assertion that “The blood of millions of innoncents” was spilled by the Iraq War (you need not provide factual support for your assrtion that I, personally, am responsible for any of those deaths, much less millions of deaths). For comparison sake, here is information from a source, The Guardian newspaper in Britain, that you cannot simply write off as right-wing, Replublican or — heaven forbid — American:

guardian.co.uk

I eagerly await your erudite responses.