re: #416 palomino

I recall that whole thing pretty well.

If only the kerfuffle could be condensed to that one phrase. It should not. And that is why the two big fact check sites were in agreement that was a huge lie, led to electoral victory for the Dem candidate. One of them called it the lie of the year, the other had it on the whopper list. They were correct IMO.

The Dems clearly implied it would impact people that retired long ago. That was the facet that was overlooked by many at the time here. Everyone focused on the facts of the proposed changes that would kick in up the road.