re: #414 J.S.

I agree…(and, then, the sheer absurdity of some of what occurs — acting as if X “knows” Y; or X now knows what/who Y was really, really was, yet based once again on a blog post, not that they’ve ever, ever actually met — o no — their “knowlege” exists only in a “cyber sense”, and is, in all probability, a case of projection; or X is entitled to Y, since, after all, they write stuff on a blog — then going ballistic or “stalking” people? good grief…if it weren’t so damn tragic, it’d almost be amusing.)

Er, thanks for the compliment.. I think? (that comment hurt my head)