re: #405 Gus

We all should remain objective and pragmatic. To pigeon hole others based on this is not the kind of environment that should be tolerated in this place. To causally throw out words like “Rosarch test for racism” is a direct implication that anyone who disagrees with an unconfirmed conclusion is a racist is a simplistic and bigoted presumption. I can’t really think of anything else to say other than that kind of blind faith based on an attempt to force other into “group think” is repugnant.

What’s interesting is that I was about to call it a Rorschach and then thought better of it (thinking of those who aren’t racist but don’t hear the epithet).

Not to exactly disagree, but I think you may be reading the comment too strongly. That kind of ambiguous evidence is often influenced by bias.. it could be many different types of bias.