re: #42 freetoken

In the debate, if you want to call it that, between mitigation and adaptation, Lomborg definitely has been on to propose that adaptation is more cost effective than most mitigation approaches.

The big question, unanswered and perhaps unanswerable, is how to price certain negative effects of climate change.

Not to mention the negative effects (and to what scope) the mitigation is.Can the earth survive getting warmer? Depending on “how much” warmer, probably. Can humanity survive what could be hugely negative economic consequences to it may take to “fix” things? Perhaps not. I can move futher north or shen more clothes if it gets hotter
I can’t feed and house myself if companies close becuase they don’t meet draconian standards