re: #434 Charles
I’m talking about the people in this thread, who insist that the DHS report was a smear on them.
I insist on no such thing, and I continue to think the DHS report was useless, vague, poorly written, and not in the least bit helpful.
For instance, in what way did it help spot this man - or Roeder! - before they acted? Not at all.
Of course, crazed postings, websites, criminal actions and actual convictions didn’t seem to help, either.