Anybody who listens to GB knows that he wasn’t expressing a call to violence. Yeah, he gets impassioned. Yeah, sometimes he goes a bit overboard. But darn-it, most of the time he’s right. And he comes up with the evidence to prove it.
He’s a muckraker, that’s for sure. But there’s so darn much muck that somebody needs to be raking through it.
In this case he got a tad graphic about what the sell-out dems might need to do to get away from their even more radical fellow travelers. But I don’t think he was necessarily wrong in his judgment of what it might come down to. But he did want to make his point in a powerful way.
Those are radical revolutionaries with a documented history of violence behind them. It is no land for old democrats. Or new ones for that matter.
His remark, taken completely out of context by a left that has become, en masse, radicalized and disingenuous is a blood libel among many perpetrated against another conservative powerhouse. It too shall pass.