re: #174 freetoken

His presentation is the Design argument all over again. He asserts some things about biological research that I am sure real biologists could take apart quickly.

I listened to about 4 minutes of that video you posted; he’s a sophist. His ID idea/argument that cells are engineered is poor logic at best; more like shitty reasoning. I see no reason to pay any more attention to a physicist pretending he understands biology than pay attention to a priest arguing the same.

To suggest that biblical/religious arguments (i.e., bronze age discussions) have any bearing on modern science is beyond fantastical. It’s sheer lunacy.