re: #460 AuldTrafford
We getting too nuanced here, the study is, as Liberal Classic pointed out, one of science. Some aspects, such as the thermal forcing of the ‘greenhouse gasses” is very well understood and demonstrable under laboratory conditions. I don’t see this as much in dispute or a question of hoax or bias.
What is less compelling are the models that make projections into the future and theories about positive and negative feedback.
The hoax is not the science, the hoax is the media and political distortions. Research and funding should continue.