re: #479 kirkspencer

Just read that article. Want to read the report as the article makes claims that…

ok. Did the IAEA really say, “Iran is poised to double output of higher-enriched uranium that can be turned easily into the core of a nuclear warhead.” Or is most of that interpretation based on the underlying fact that Iran has recently doubled the number of working centrifuges?

And since I’ve seen another article, I notice there’s no mention that Iran has also massively increased the conversion of the existing 20% to fuel plates - things that basically can’t be turned to weapons without basically treating them as unrefined uranium.

But I still want to see what the IAEA actually said. Almost all the reporters have this habit of writing what they want to see.

Bombs use enriched uranium @ >85%
20% would make an highly inefficient bomb.