re: #487 OhCrapIHaveACrushOnSarahPalin

His own stated views, right now, today (well, a few weeks ago — “in the past”, in your view)

No, not “‘in the past’ in my view”: that is not what I pointed out and would be irrelevant anyhow.

are directly in line with just why lynch law was never passed in the first place, and is the reason for disproportionate sentencing laws.

Whatever “directly in line” means here; I don’t think you know what it is supposed to mean yourself. It certainly does not mean any actual logical connection.

Why not just say instead why you are so personally invested in defending someone else’s nonsensical non-sequitur?

I’m not. I am “attacking” yours.