re: #490 000G

No, not “‘in the past’ in my view”: that is not what I pointed out and would be irrelevant anyhow.

Yes, those were your words, and what you pointed out.

Whatever “directly in line” means here; I don’t think you know what it is supposed to mean yourself. It certainly does not mean any actual logical connection.

Nonsense paragraph.

If you need me to state it again for the 17th time I’d be happy to oblige: the views DF has — racist, in your words — of black criminality, are behind lack of anti-lynch law then, and disproportionate sentencing practices, now.

They are white supremacist views, yes, out of Birth of A Nation, but they date back far earlier than that.

I’m not. I am “attacking” yours.

Well, you’re not doing a very good job with this so-called attack. What’s it really about, anyway?