Ideally the current law should be shot down and if something is needed the new is well thought out, well written, and implemented right after an election in order to maximize the time to get the system in place and IDs issued before the next election.

And these actions pointing out a hole in the law that is being acted upon might also get the judiciary’s attention regarding the shortcomings of the law as enacted.

I also wonder why such a clause was put in there anyways? CYA action that was not expected to be picked up on by anyone?