A good blow by blow description of the court hearing can be found here…

ohforgoodnesssake.com

The judge stated that he “had some thoughts on this application” and that many of those issues were also raised in the opposition:

*No proof of service

*Exclusive method to obtain 3rd party information is by subpoena

*The subpoena was served after the motion to compel was filed and served improperly

*There was no notice to the “consumer” under California CCP 1985 or 1987

*Taitz argument should address the request for sanctions, which the court is contemplating imposing

Taitz then tenders a large stapled stack of stuff she calls proofs of service and gives Mr. Ritt her only other copy

Her “legal” arguments are ridiculous, she even brings up Donald Trump’s $5,000,000 offer for the records being refused as proof that they are hiding something. The woman is insane…