re: #422 avanti

Again, the election is over, but the constitution was a flawed document before amended and if you read the quote in context, you’d know he was talking primarily about racial issues.

Just once I would like if you could defend your comments instead of these silly bait-n-switch tactics.

FYI: The flawed constitution quote I was referring to was from a radio interview Obama gave in 2002 in which he said the constitution was flawed because it did not guarantee a minimum income to Americans. It had nothing to do with race, you smug jerk.

Now, you said you liked his speech because it made you feel good to think Obama was elected because of the principles enshrined within the US Constitution. I pointed out the US Constitution isn’t about Obama, but if he likes it so much why did he spend most of his life consorting with people who want to trash it?

Now you respond to that point, ok? That’s how intelligent discussions are done.