Hmmmm… I’m no logician and hopefully I’m not risking my account here, Charles, but I read the whole post and honestly got the impression that your basic reply to every hole Prager attempted to poke in your ‘Top 10’ was that since you intentionally made every point in your list so vague that it could be applied uniformly to the right, yet if any specific conservative is mentioned that doesn’t fit the bill, your defense can be “I didn’t mention that person. Straw man.” In other words, you require Prager to prove a negative.