re: #503 Salamantis

Which is precisely the point. Miller can empirically demonstrate his contentions; Behe cannot. And Behe knows this, or should. So what is Behe trying to do, and why? All he can do; attempt to muddy waters, in a failed and futile endeavor to obscure the facts of the matter, because it pays him to do so.

Ummm……Behe is trying to show design. His efforts so far have failed. (shrug) Seems obvious. He has explicitly and strongly supported the notion of Universal common descent: that makes him not a creationist. THAT’S the point. ID is not synonymous with creationism. It is crap: that’s the other point. In order for ID to be crap, it does not have to be creationism. There is science that is crap too, and also is not creationism. while all creationism is scierntific crap, not all crap in science, and even not all crap in evolutionary biology, is creationism.