re: #41 captdiggs

Two emails from the Director of CRU involving more than a few people.
Sorry Charles, if you don’t see that there is something wrong in the conduct of these scientists, then that is your prerogative.
To latch onto subjective adjective ( “enormous”) doesn’t clear up the real problem which is, who is lying and distorting data.

And by the way, the second email about deletion…was in reference to “AR4”.
There is context. AR4 is: [Link: www.ipcc-data.org…]
So they were discussing scientific data, not family business.
And we really don’t know if in fact emails were deleted.
Again, this may ( I emphasize may) rise to the level of a crime
[Link: lawiscool.com…]

If East Anglia is anything like most schools, emails are permanently logged for future reference in the event of criminal charges, civil lawsuits, etc. Deleting emails protects them from being hacked into and spread around, (assuming you get around to the deletion before the hackers hack in) but it doesn’t outright erase the data.