re: #51 EiMitch

Except those interactions, as popularly defined, are indistinguishable from natural phenomenon.

Except it’s just not true. And in any case, as I have already pointed out, I was not limiting what I wrote to some choice representation of God. You came with your own limited definition I never had in mind. That’s just BS.

Here is some more context you’ve dropped/missed. I’ve been talking about people disagreeing over basic definitions. Yet, you assumed I was accusing you of not being consistent with your own arguments? Okay, whatevs.

Um, sorry, but you are making less and less sense. And I’m not in the mood to decipher your dark sayings.