Comment

“Human Rights Community” Agrees: Gilad Shalit Should Remain in Captivity « Commentary Magazine

52
reine.de.tout6/26/2011 6:37:41 am PDT

re: #51 lobengula

I had written …

and I have. I have cited save the children, B’Tselem and Israeli prison services figures. As for describing the time magazine article as hamasesque, well of course you thought that. It was critical of Israel, which is synonymous with antisemitism, right?

I think someone here has the Gilad Shalit poster. And t-shirt. You see how insensitive that is?
Th bottom line is I cant even point out that israel has child prisoners without being accused of antisemitism by the ‘Israel can do no wrong brigade’. It’s almost as if you’re trying to discourage people from speaking frankly about Israel. But I’m sure that’s not your aim..

You can point out whatever you want. You seem to take offense, however, that others 1) have a different opinion, and 2) point out their own information to you. You can expect to be challenged, but you’d prefer, it seems, to make your proclamations and have everyone ooohing and aaahing at your brilliance.

You made claims and cited sources, but provided direct links to reports that do NOT stand up to scrutiny as “ample evidence”, nor do they support your statements. If you make a claim, it needs to be backed up with a direct link to the information you’ve used to come to your conclusion.

I have no clue if you are anti-semitic or not. I do think you are badly informed, and unwilling to look at and consider the ample evidence of the other side, and yes, the links provided to you by researchok and marjoriemoon provide much more ample evidence of their statements than your links did for your statements.

You want to expound and not be challenged? This is not the place to be.