re: #41 lawhawk
Elections have consequences - and an opportunity to sidestep the Norquist pledge. Courtesy of GOPer Chris Gibson (NY-19), we get the justification to no longer follow the pledge because that was made to his constituents while part of NY-20. Redistricting allows him the opportunity to no longer heed the pledge.
Heh.
Yunno, even that is a horseshit excuse. How about simply “It’s a non-binding pledge that nobody is compelled to uphold”?