re: #50 imp_62

Obdicut, you accuse me of engaging in “insane hyperbole”. You don’t consider that at all hypoerbolic? Seriously?

No, I don’t. I found your use of hyperbole while you were denying that you used hyperbole to be insane.

Again:

You have accused me of multiple things, and you haven’t substantiated any of them. At all. You accused me of moving my hypothesis and attacking you in ad hominem attacks— neither of which actually happened.

If you want to lecture other people on their terrible, terrible behavior, having made unsubstantiated attacks on them that you didn’t bother to even attempt to validate kind of cuts into your credibility a little.

LIke this:

You have a predilection for positioning your opponent’s argument as offensive to basic decency, and implying base motives to their position.

I didn’t talk, at all, ever, in the least, about your motives. Yet here you are, asserting that I do. What’s up with that? Why do you think it’s okay to make an accusation that heavy and not try to support it in the least?