re: #527 Charles

Charles, all I can say is that the position “Behe is a creationist” is equivalent to saying “Behe is a pathological liar.” Both statements are supportable opinion, even if I disagree. But it is also a supportable opinion to say that Behe is not a pathological liar, and it is empirical fact that he has expressed unequivocal support for universal common descent, and defended it with reference to the Roman catholic teaching.

Why not stick to indisputable fact? ID is neither productive nor supportable as empirical science, and ID is most often simply a PR vehicle for creationism.