I did find it interesting that in the one interview I saw of Napolitano, she tried to pass the blame. When asked if she had signed off on it (And believe me, if I was head of DHS and a report was coming out from my department, I’d read the damn thing and not claim I didn’t sign off on it), she said no but that she had skimmed it.

That seems very sketchy when the head of DHS won’t claim responsibility, regardless of whether the claims of bias are true, for her own departments’s reports.

Now, the whole it was an attack on verterans, etc., etc., I don’t know if that’s true. But, if she isn’t knowing exactly what is going on and has not read every word of a report by her department, is she really up for the task of being head of DHS?