re: #536 Obdicut

I dance around nothing. So if a comment is genocidal it automatically besmirches the blogger, but something simply anti-Islam, calling to “muck the Fuslims” it doesn’t? And if Charles changed his mind on the relevance of comments, why isn’t he equally as guilty retroactively? Or half as equally as guilty if the comments were half as bad? Or shouldn’t an honest post on Charles’ behalf say: “even though people used to make somewhat less offensive comments on my blog and they didn’t apply to me, I use very bad comments on other blogs and conclude without any benefit of the doubt that the comments apply to the other bloggers.”

Now that I’m done criticizing someone else and not doing anything constructive of my own I’ll take a nap or something.