re: #484 kcladderman
No i think it is most of us put more faith in what Zombie says than the truthers or Van Jones
Let’s summarise the wingnut ‘logic’ at work here:
1. Even though there is no evidence that Jones was a truther, and he’s denied ever being one, we should still consider him suspicious and a potential liar because of his past associations.
AND:
2. Even though there’s tons of evidence that truthers lie about everything and always have, we should STILL take their word over Jones’— because THEIR past associations and conduct are totally irrelevant.
This kind of irrationality puts the D in ODS.