re: #46 Targetpractice

The appropriate response to any variation of “What about Tara Reade?” is “What about her?” She dropped off the radar months ago when the media began to realize that nothing added up, none of her “witnesses” were contemporaneous, she kept changing her allegations, and she was caught fibbing about her credentials in order to collect paychecks as an “expert witness.”

Like I said above, the only way you can continue to claim to “believe” Tara is by spinning conspiracy theories about hidden files at the University of Delaware and everybody who knew the woman at the time she worked in Joe’s office choosing to lie about rape and sexual harassment to protect him.

Well, there’s the appearance of a late-stage rodent copulation, due to the time in the election cycle.

That doesn’t mean discount Ms. Dorris, her story will be checked by everyone, just like Ms. Reade’s story was.

Considering the wake of wreckage Mr. Trump has behind him regarding women, that alone lend some credibility to her claims … but also offers an opportunity for Republicans to throw a monkey wrench in the works.

In any case, if her claims are true, I doubt it matters much to Deplorables.