re: #48 Targetpractice
Because whether I wish to admit it or not, the “gun rights advocates” have a point that going after AR-15s when the majority of gun crimes aren’t committed with them is rather pointless. It would be a might like trying to address vehicular deaths by focusing strictly on the odd elderly driver who plows into a crowded sidewalk.
You’ve stated its pointless, but you haven’t actually proven the point. Why would trying to address either of those be pointless? Does something need to be common before its worth addressing?