re: #543 Occasional Reader

It’s unusual - not unheard of, but unusual - that a law review’s Editor in Chief would not himself/herself publish a “note” (as they’re usually called).

Quite possible. But then I don’t know for sure that he didn’t - do you? It was asserted above by someone who thinks O “never did any work”, but it’s just that, an assertion. Until I see evidence, it has the weight of any other assertion here.