re: #31 Obdicut

I couldn’t understand your post, sorry.

All I am saying is that although no retraction at Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government blog, he does admit he might be wrong. However, until the shadow Bertha Lewis is clearly explained there might be another explanation.

Would it be the first time a ‘unnamed’ staffer was put into a situation where they diverted the willing press?

Again, he is saying that there might be two special Bertha Lewis’. However no one seems to know who the second one is, or anything about her. Other than a different middle initial.

In a similar way that many are reporting that ACORN videos where ‘heavily edited’ therefore ‘debunked’. Edited for broadcast does not mean debunked. Big Government also provided full transcripts and audio. However ridiculous laws and possible lawsuits have forced the makers to take out the audio for broadcast for some.

The editing does not mean debunked. In fact Acorn did fire those employees, and even talked about how the videos did expose wrongdoing (illegal might be a different standard). No one said that what was happening on the videos was a crime, and the ACORN employees should have been arrested. Only that what there were doing was wrong, and a sign of other wrongdoing.