Comment

Breitbart's John Nolte Says Bill O'Reilly is Nuts, Pamela Geller Is Just Like Jesus

58
BeachDem5/08/2015 9:14:29 pm PDT

re: #21 wheat-dogghazi-mailgate

UpChuck has filed an appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court to have Michael Brown’s juvie records released. I haven’t read the entire petition yet, but the main point seems to be MO law does not say anything about a person retaining those rights of privacy after he’s dead.

[Embedded content]

Many thoughts—first the general:

1. What the fuck does he think he’s going to prove, even if, by some strange chance, he gets to stomp on Michael Brown’s grave and pick his bones some more? What a fucking ghoul he is. Does he somehow think this is going to be his big scoop? That a year after the young man died, the ginger avenger is going to prove that he wasn’t perfect? Wow—color me impressed.

2. Can’t believe these lawyers would still be doing any of this pro bono—if they are, they’re bigger fools than upchuck.

3. I hope they just laugh in his face, as they’ve done before, and just flat out tell him to go to hell (and I hope he has had to spend a lot of his his wife’s or his idiotic donors’ money.

Now to specifics in the filing:

a professional journalist…

Well, right there in the first paragraph is one big ass lie; but I digress.

his stepfather’s long-standing status as a key lieutenant in the Bloods gang organization, or Brown’s history of violence as a juvenile delinquent. The latter two facts have been given to Relators by a series of whistleblowers…

A “series of whistleblowers?” Really? Who were they blowing the whistle on? And how does his mention of anonymous imaginary friends even factor into an actual lawsuit?

Hundreds, if not thousands of businesses closed out of fear…

Say what? When did thousands of businesses close?

Relators have received multiple communications from state and federal confidential law enforcement sources which have emphatically and repeatedly claimed to Relators that Michael Brown had an extensive and serious juvenile record, and that he was implicated and involved in murdering another person.

Again with his imaginary friends. They’ve already told him once (or maybe even twice) that no such records exist.

Relators have invested an enormous amount of time and resources into trying to determine the validity of these claims, and it thus goes without saying that Relators have found the confidential sources to be entirely credible…

That makes no sense. If the sources are entirely credible, why has the idiot invested enormous amounts of time and resources? And, if he’s invested all the time and resources, why does he not have any other validation than the words of his imaginary friends?

Whatever the case, Relators and the public have a right to this information…

NO THEY DON’T you little freak.

Ugh.