re: #607 DCMC

I will gladly spell it out: I wrote about the low and base tone of the debate on this thread, much of it directed in crude attacks on me, and your response is to crudely mock what I wrote That is the very definition of what I was talking about.

But, as everyone can be wrong sometimes, sorry if I’ve misunderstood your comment.

And yet you call it crude! Seems as though it was refined enough to hit just what I was aiming for.

You have provided a great target for that by declaring yourself the Minister of Tone.