re: #14 laxmatt1984

You want the other party to fail in implementing their policies. I don’t understand why this is controversial.

It’s only “controversial” if a Republican’s doing it. I mean…how can anyone on the opposite side of the aisle “offer something positive” when talking about a Supreme Court nominee? Does anyone have any examples of this ever happening, historically? Just askin’.

The Democrats kicked, clawed, and scratched to thwart Bush at absolutely every turn and now they get the high ground and the Republicans are to be expected to just lie down? For fear of being “stuck on fail?” If that’s the big idea count me out.