Comment

American Renaissance Objects to “Anti-ZOG” Claim; Campaign for Liberty 'He's not with us'

62
Buck1/10/2011 4:59:55 pm PST

re: #61 Obdicut

Orly?

Actually the LANGUAGE on the Sarah Palin poster was very neutral.

Image: 222068904.png

Did you bother to read any of the accompanying text, and notice that the states, rather than individuals, are targeted?

No, of course not. You have your conclusion already. You accuse other people of ‘stacking the deck’ and ‘making up the rules’ while you stack the deck and make up the rules, declaring things ‘equal’ on the basis of your desire for them to be equal.

You’re called out on supporting Michelle Malkin, who writes for a White Supremacist website, and you say you’re not going to write about it because you don’t want a time out. Have some courage, Buck. Explain what your defense of Michelle’s alliance with White Supremacists is.

Not the SarahPAC Graphic that everyone is pointing to.

This is the one that Charles pointed to:

littlegreenfootballs.com

The panel you point to doesn’t have aggressive language either. YES, they targeted elected officials for special attention in order to change those districts from blue to red. Not to kill them. To take back the 20! AND my point is that both sides do the exact same targeting. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee website had one that used bullseyes and targeted republicans by name.

Again, both sides do it, and are equally benign.