I’m not sure if the management would agree, but I can’t believe how laughably similar “Burismagate” became today to “Memogate”:

- “Incriminating” documents received from an unidentifiable “source”

- Guy of…questionable legitimacy who was relied upon to launder the docs that insists the “source” is totally legit because…well, fuck you, that’s why.

- What we’re provided with are copies of the original docs, with the originals unavailable for analysis

- The docs were provided to an outlet with a known and strong bias that is totally willing to publish them without the least bit of deeper research.

- Everybody involved in the whole “chain of custody” is crooked as fuck and/or connected to past efforts to publish similar “scandals.”

- The docs themselves are under scrutiny as possible forgeries based upon simple visual analysis.