re: #61 lawhawk

[Embedded content]

When Dan Quayle is the authority on constitutional law and what the certification of the election involves, you are truly fucked up. When Quayle’s the one who ultimately prevails on the constitutionality question, I throw in the towel altogether.

This is some Matrix level fuckery.

I’ll beg to (minorly) differ: When the Constitutional duties of the VP - and the limitations thereon - are so obvious that even a second-rate hack and intellectual lightweight like Dan Quayle can see them and realize what the right thing to do is … well, it just makes Trump and his failed-coup plans look even worse.
Though, disgracefully, his “base” probably won’t ever realize this.