re: #56 Charles Johnson
Noted. At this point I don’t know who to believe, unless it’s nobody yet. It’s not as if mistresses/spokespeople are reliable sources. It’s not as if the CIA is shy about lying to protect secrets. I’m still wait and see. wait and see if it takes a Freedom of Information action to sort it out just before the next election.
But what would her motive be to make this up? Just craving the spotlight for a while?