re: #53 EPR-radar

re: #47 goddamnedfrank

I’m sorry, it is hard for me to take a constitutional vagueness issue predicated on a transient state of affairs seriously.

Why? The consequences to the citizen facing a criminal record based on the reality are just as tangible.

How about we move on to the issue of the State making criminal continuing to possess an item that was not only legal to own at the time of purchase but was then specifically grandfathered under previous law. Even under Prohibition there was no ban on prior possession, only production, distribution and sale. That’s why the rich weren’t inconvenienced much, they had plenty of time to stock up.