re: #643 Hhar

cont.

The most ardent defender of memetics in this thread won’t even dare to classify it as science, and I agree with that much of what he says. By these standards, plus the fact that he’s a howling antitheist bigot (did you read his post Sept 11 column?)

It’s probably more philosophy than science, as Dawkins himself accepted in his book “The Selfish Gene”. I read Dawkins post sept 11 column, and I liked it. I suppose I must be a howling anti-theist bigot too. Imagine thinking that sept 11th was anything to do with religion. Perish the thought!

he’s a pathological liar too.

Examples of his pathological lies, please.

I find it funny that because I am saying this, a number of people seem to have gotten the impression that I’m an ID supporter.

Maybe something to do with your evident passion for obfuscating the connection between ID and creationism, and your strange and -strangely comitted- ‘defence’ of Behe as a mere innocent idiot in all of this, a claim which as has been shown, simply doesn’t bear out. Add to that your attempts to misrepresent how scientists like Dawkins are viewed within the biological community.

I am definitely going to have to keep this up.

You enjoy being taken for an IDer although you aren’t one? You are a maniac of some sort that’s for sure. Also, you’ve been at this for over 24 hours solid, without a break.

The psychiatrist, Hhar, the psychiatrist.