Comment

The Only Article About Guns You Need to Read Today

662
Coracle12/20/2012 11:15:39 am PST

re: #657 sattv4u2


The 2001 cuts are irrelevant to blueraven’s statement

Then perhaps he shouldn’t have stated “.no tax cuts should have been implemented in early 2000s.” because I’m fairly certain anyone would consider Summer of 2001 as being in THE EARLY 2000’s!!!

Satt, this is getting a little ridiculous, don’t you think? It really is basic logical parsing - or set theory. Summer 2003 is also early 2000’s.

Blueraven never said that two wars were happening throughout the early 2000’s, but rather made a general statement opinion that no tax cuts should have taken place in the early 2000’s when we were in two wars. The facts of the matter are that:
We were in two wars in the early 2000’s (though not every minut of them).
Tax cuts were passed in the early 2000’s (2001 and 2003 are the specific examples)
There were tax cuts passed when we were engaged in two wars in the early 2000’s. (The union of those two sets: the 2003 tax cuts).