re: #672 Emerald

What a wonderfully pathetic argument! Of course, I never said all militias resort to that, but the only way you can counter the fact that there are racist right-wing extremists is to resort to bit of blatant lying!

Now who’s being revisionist? Let’s recap, shall we?

First, Charles establishes his beliefs that all militias are extreme.

re: #651 Charles

I’m out of this discussion. Feel free to sling some more insults at me; I can’t continue arguing with people who think militias aren’t extreme and Christian Identity isn’t a far right group.

Second, I question why he believes that a militia is inherently extremist.

re: #657 chipbennett

Why is it that you believe that a militia is inherently extremist?

Third, you - and here’s the critical part - without qualification, question whether modern militias are something about which i am ignorant, and claim that “they” (basic grammatic structure and reading comprehension: “they” is used as a pronoun for the still-without-qualification “militias”) commit violent crimes to fund “their” (basic grammatic structure and reading comprehension: “their” is used as a pronoun for the still-without-qualification “militias”) race wars.

re: #659 Emerald

So, are you that ignorant of what the modern militias are, or are you a supporter of the violent crimes they commit to fund their race wars?

Then, making the logical conclusion - based on your own words - that you believe that militias commit violent crimes in order to fund race wars, questioned you on that belief. Your response? To claim that you never said any such thing.

So, where, again, is the blatant lying?