re: #645 harrisam

This article by Bert Rutan should be required reading before coming down on one side or the other in the AGW discussion.

[Link: rps3.com…]

From your link:

While this is my first publication on AGW data presentation fraud, some of my conclusions were originally presented on July 19th 2009 at the Pasadena Art Center College of Design (when I accepted their lifetime achievement award).

And why is this required reading?