re: #67 Rightwingconspirator

So you’re fine with the current level of accidental shootings in the US at the moment, and misidentity shootings? You don’t think we should improve that, at all?

Of course I want to improve those numbers and it sucks for you to imply otherwise. Low blow dude. A choice to disagree with your proposal is not what you imply here. Ah well anyone can make a mistake. Or two.

Show me your test, and then I will answer.

Then this whole conversation has been completely pointless. I made it absolutely clear that I wasn’t going to design the test. But you have repeatedly been against even the idea of this test, insisting over and over that POST is completely sufficient on its own.

And you have never, ever, ever explained, if you’re confident that POST gives sufficient training, why you’re afraid of the idea of a test, not one composed by me, but one composed by experts.

I am, once again, incredibly frustrated by your lack of response to direct questions, your constant moving around of your arguments, and assertions that home self-defense is ‘pretty easy’ and that there’s really no big problem worth addressing with legal guns in this country.

Again, I am trying to help. I am trying to help responsible gun owners as much as anyone else. But the resistance to this in the gun community is going to mean that within our lifetime you will probably see a backlash of very strong gun restrictions, unless responsible gun owners meet the concerned public halfway. What I’m offering is a way to do that and you’re just so contemptuously rejecting it. It is incredibly frustrating.