re: #43 Charles Johnson

“The CIA eventually disproved those reports” is an assertion without evidence.

Right. It’s second-hand reporting of Petraeus’ testimony. Maybe the reporter misheard something - again, a transcript would be very helpful. But the theory that there was a demonstration, and also an attack that used the demonstration for cover, fits with what little we actually know so far, and doesn’t actually contradict the NYT’s reporting.