re: #71 LudwigVanQuixote

Actually I can say that the burden of proof was so high that the law was unenforceable.

I didn’t say you couldn’t say that. I said that that doesn’t make the text moot.

No. I am not saying that there aren’t things that are unpleasant in the texts at all.

Good. Than I’m really at a loss as to what you’re objecting to.

There was vastly, vastly more equality than you are giving credit to however.

Really? Point out a way that I haven’t given it credit for equality, please. In as much as I’ve talked about it, I’ve said it was yards better than anything else at the time, and is still better than many places today. How on earth is that not giving it enough credit? What did I say that doesn’t give it enough credit?