re: #691 Charles
Nope. No death panels, but less chance of receiving treatment once your age passes 50 years or so. So no “death panels” just a less chance of treatment.
Difference without distinction.
It’s stunning that provisions that were never in the bill are now being removed. Makes sense. I suppose.
I mean. Come on.
Death panels (or something by another name) are the basis of the bill. You cannot lower costs without denying coverage to someone. Either Obama’s famous (maybe you should take aspirin instead of getting a pacemaker) or whatever. Clearly, the goal is to deny services to people on a cost-benefit basis.