re: #14 Obdicut

But we have no idea whether this story is true. That is my main problem with it. This is not “Anti-gay pastor paid a gay prostitute for naked snorkel massages”. This is “Guy claims that O’Donnell wanted it real bad while drunk”. Also, he’s a stereotype of a Maxim-reading douchebag who claims he only didn’t have sex with her because of a literal cosmetic issue.

My main problem is that even if every word of it were true, so what? It is no one’s business. It really is sleazy to make the private, public years later, only to grab a little fame or backstabbing by glomming onto someone else.