re: #22 Nyet

Nice moving of goalposts. There was no “in those words” in the comment I was responding to.
She called him a bigot, period. She did not use the noun “bigot”, however she did mention “his bigotry”, which can be factually summarized as her calling him a bigot, just as me saying “Trump’s antisemitism is terrible” can be factually summarized as me calling Trump an antisemite. It is extremely ridiculous to split hairs about this just to save your little narrative.

Had to downding this, because in my view it is wrong in an important way. Consider telling someone that what they just said is racist, rather than saying “you are a racist.” Big, big difference. To me this is the same, and it is putting a “both sides do it” where it definitely does not belong.