re: #71 Targetpractice

It’s the usual narrative: “There’s a lot more voter fraud than libruls acknowledge!”. But the hilarious bit is that the 5.7 million is the high-end of (wait for it) the estimated number of fraudulent votes. The low end? 594,000. In other words, it’s a wild-assed guess based upon somebody else’s data. Yes, that’s right, the “study’s” authors didn’t do the footwork themselves, they’re basing this BS upon a Harvard/YouGov biannual poll of voters.

600k to 5.7 million? That’s one hell of an error bar.