Comment

Palin charges critics with 'blood libel'

77
Buck1/13/2011 9:45:06 am PST

re: #73 Obdicut

And yet you, weaselly, claim to both think she shouldn’t have used it and are defending the use as perfectly fine. Make up your mind.

It is not weaselly. I think it was an appropriate use, but there are so many assholes like you that would attack her for it. So I would suggest to her, if she asked not to.

And yes, I think I’m right, and Shmuley is wrong. Just as I think when a rabbi says that Israel is suffering because of the sins of her people, that he is wrong, or that a child conceived to a Jewish mother with gentile sperm ‘cannot be 100% normal’ or that Buddhists pray to idols.

Here you go again. Attributing to someone things they never said.

I am clearly giving you examples of people who feel the way I do. These are famous smart people who should NOT be called stupid and pathetic.

Of course there are going to be differences in opinion. There should be. But you act like there can’t be. That there is only the one way to use that term, and that there can’t be any other.

Pathetic, shameful, stupid…. all hateful rhetoric that you SHOULD be against, but that you actually throw out at everyone who might dare disagree with you.